Various state law protections exist for protecting a business’s intangible assets and information, and The Reha Law Firm LLC stands ready to provide its clients with the best representation possible regarding this component of today’s business environment.
Included in the Colorado state law system is the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), which provides protection for “trade secrets.” In order for information to constitute a trade secret, the UTSA requires that it be both secret and of value. Value will likely be assumed for any information that has any type of recognized commercial value, so the real issue under the UTSA is usually that of secrecy.
If you have questions regarding trade secrets and how to protect them, contact our business law firm online to schedule a consultation with an experienced Denver lawyer.
Secrecy means what the term implies, that the information not be generally known to those outside of a select number of people to whom access is given to such information on a need-to-know, commercial necessity basis. This does not necessarily mean that the information is known to no one outside the company, but universal knowledge of information clearly removes its status as the secret of any claimed owner thereof.
For secrecy to exist, the UTSA requires that the reputed owner of the information take “protective measures” to guard against unwarranted disclosure of such information to those persons to whom access should not be given. What will be sufficient protective measures is a case-by-case issue and likely depends upon the type of information professed to be secret.
Customer Lists — Customer lists, a segment of information that business owners routinely believe is secret, may not be afforded the same general sense of secrecy as might be afforded to a secret recipe, formula or business method, although customer lists are certainly within the realm of information bases, which may be afforded trade secrecy protection. The issue of secrecy for customer base will revolve around the same issues as any potential secret: secrecy, value, measures taken to maintain secrecy, and such things as expense, time and effort necessitated to independently replicate the information.
Design and Business Methods — For such things as designs and business methods, the same analysis is performed, but the inherent sense of secrecy of such information may be higher. Indeed, some of the most fundamental and valuable business information in existence has never been patented, copyrighted or trademarked.
For instance, the recipe for Coca-Cola syrup (perhaps the most closely guarded secret this side of nuclear launch codes) has never been patented. Rather, it is simply a very closely guarded secret whose secrecy has been maintained for more than 120 years, which was wise on Coke’s part because patent protection has only a limited lifetime before the technology is rendered a matter of public domain.
Just how far the owner of information must go to meet the protective measures requirement of secrecy is uncertain. Adopting a system that incorporates company-wide mandatory trade secrecy agreements and the like may be sufficient, or it may not.
At The Reha Law Firm LLC, our Colorado trade secret attorney provides assistance to clients in establishing viable and enforceable trade secrecy systems, including the drafting of non-compete agreements and trade secrecy agreements, nondisclosure agreements, licensing agreements and other agreements protecting soft assets, and we do so with one goal in mind: enforceability under applicable law.
To schedule a consultation with our highly experienced lawyer for creative asset protection solutions, call The Reha Law Firm LLC at 303-932-1222303-932-1222, or contact us online. From our office in Littleton, we represent clients in Denver and throughout Colorado.
DISCLAIMER: This information is being provided as a public service, and by doing so, neither The Reha Law Firm LLC nor any attorney associated with The Reha Law Firm LLC is providing any legal advice of any nature to any person or firm, whatsoever. If the reader believes that he or she is in need of legal advice as to the issues discussed herein or for any other reason, he or she is advised to retain an attorney of choice to provide appropriate legal representation.
Monday to Friday:
9:00 AM – 5:00 PM
Saturday and Sunday:
$4.2 Million Unfair Competition Award Upheld on Appeal. John was lead counsel in Optimus Corp. v. Synergetics, Inc., Colorado Court of Appeals No. 12CA1910. On March 6, 2014, the Court of Appeals issued its Opinion unanimously affirming a decision in which $2,238,042 actual damages... Read more
Auto-Bicycle Collision Generates Two Limits Settlements. In 2012-2013, John represented a bicyclist who was struck by a pickup truck while riding. The cyclist incurred significant long-term cognitive injuries. John obtained a settlement against the driver at fault for the large limits of that driver's auto policy... Read more
Another Auto-Bicycle Collision Generates Limits Settlement. In 2012-2013, John represented another bicyclist who was struck by a car while riding. The cyclist incurred severe neuromuscular, nerve and spinal injuries. John obtained a limits settlement against the insurance policy... Read more